SAMPLE Curriculum Proposal

Proposal · Camino Academy LLC

Curriculum
Development
Proposal

English Acquisition Program

We align on success criteria with your stakeholders before we lock curriculum or live PD, then build and facilitate to that agreement — not a one-size-fits-all canned workshop.

Prepared for Sample ISD (fictional placeholder)
Prepared by Camino Academy LLC
Date May 8, 2026

Sample proposal — not a portfolio. This deck simulates how a Camino consulting engagement is scoped and packaged. Names and dates are placeholders. For published work, case studies, and bilingual samples, see the work portfolio on Wix.

Julio César Manzano at a Fulbright-related convening
At a glance
Standards-aligned English acquisition — ready for immediate implementation.
Scope: Full curriculum + assessment toolkit + teacher guide
Duration: 10 weeks across 4 structured phases
Includes: 2 virtual PD sessions (discovery-first arc) + 1 revision cycle
Model: Fixed fee · Milestone-based payments
Project fee
$12,500
01Executive summary
01

Executive Summary

The goal is clear.
The path is built.

Stronger instructional consistency, clearer language progression, and measurable learner growth.

Camino Academy LLC proposes to develop a standards-aligned English acquisition curriculum that instructors can implement immediately. Program leadership signs off on what “implemented” must evidence before we finalize core materials and PD agendas, so the work product and synchronous blocks track your acceptance bar instead of a default sequence. Professional development is treated like any other deliverable: scoped to observable outcomes, bounded in time, and front-loaded with discovery so synchronous time is spent on what your teachers actually need to execute — not generic theory blocks.

Stronger instructional consistency across the program
Clearer language progression tied to measurable outcomes
Practical tools teachers can use without additional training overhead
Project Snapshot
Project Type
Fixed-Scope Curriculum Build
Duration
10 Weeks · 4 Phases
PD Sessions
2 Virtual PD Sessions · Discovery-First
Revision Cycle
1 Structured Round
Investment
$12,500 Fixed Fee
02Scope of work
02

Scope of Work

Six deliverables.
Zero ambiguity.

Everything your team needs to launch, run, and sustain the program — delivered in a single project cycle.

01
Program Framework

Scope and sequence design aligned to standards — the structural backbone every unit builds from.

02
Instructional Units

Complete lesson plans and materials ready for immediate classroom use, designed for consistency across instructors.

03
Assessment Toolkit

Diagnostic, formative, and summative tools that track actual language growth — not just completion.

04
Teacher Implementation Guide

A practical reference that reduces onboarding friction and keeps implementation consistent across the team.

05
2 Virtual PD Sessions

Two live blocks (90 minutes each, hard stop) plus structured async between sessions. Objectives tie to your implementation checklist and walkthrough look-fors — see the PD section for the full arc.

06
Structured Revision Cycle

One dedicated round of revisions based on your team's feedback before final handoff.

03Professional development
03

Professional Development

How PD runs
when Camino consults.

Customer-focused, solutions-focused, time-bounded. Discovery happens before design — so live PD teaches what your team will actually use, and metrics tell you whether implementation shifted.

The two included synchronous sessions are the capstone of a short arc: align on evidence, train on the exact moves in your materials, then verify transfer with lightweight data your site already owns. Below is representative of how a district engagement is structured; Sample ISD is fictional and for illustration only.

Before live PD
Discovery + lock-ins
  • Objective: Reduce rework — agree what “good implementation” looks like on your bell schedule.
  • Formats: 60–90 min leadership sync; artifact review (async, 5 business days).
  • Time box: Complete before Session A is scheduled.
Live PD (×2)
Train + practice
  • Objective: Teachers execute two prioritized moves from the new unit kit (e.g., oral language launch + formative checkpoint).
  • Formats: Virtual synchronous (Zoom/Teams) · 90 min each · bilingual support materials as agreed.
  • Time box: Hard stop at 90 min; parking lot captured for async follow-up.
Between + after
Async bridge + evidence
  • Objective: Close the gap between “understood in the room” and “happening in classrooms.”
  • Formats: Recorded walkthrough of slides/unit pages; implementation checklist; 30-day pulse survey.
  • Time box: Async clips ≤20 min; post-PD window = 30 instructional days unless otherwise contracted.
Stakeholder pre-meeting — needs sensing

A structured pre-PD step aligns session design to your real constraints (coverage, tech, language access) so synchronous minutes are not spent renegotiating scope.

Who attends: program lead + 2 teacher leads + optional tech liaison What we review: 2 lesson plans or short video clips they select; recent EL roster/ML data they already use; master schedule constraints What gets locked: priority standards strand, pilot cohort, language for family-facing pages, success criteria for Session A/B
Sample artifacts (illustrative excerpts)

Redacted fictional district — not a live client file.

Sample document
One-page PD scope summary · Sample ISD · Internal draft
PD Scope — English Acquisition Pilot
Goal: By Day 30 post–Session B, 80% of pilot teachers score ≥ proficient on walkthrough items EL-1…EL-3. Sessions: (A) Unit launch protocols · (B) Formative toolkit calibration Async: Checklist + 12 min module between A and B Owner: Director of EL (implementation); Camino (design + facilitation + survey instrument)
Sample document
Stakeholder intake — excerpt
Q4. Where does instruction currently break down for newcomers in Period 1–3? → “Academic oral output — they stay in single words during turn-and-talk.” Q7. What data may we reference in PD (no new collection)? → “WIDA ACCESS roster export (Spring) + building walkthrough notes from March.”
Sample document
Session A agenda — fragment (first 45 min)
0:00–0:10 Outcome + look-for tied to Sample ISD rubric EL-2 0:10–0:25 Model: launch moves from Unit 3.2 slides (teacher-facing) 0:25–0:45 Paired rehearsal + public commitment (one shift each)
Metrics — pre, during, post

Measurement stays lean: reuse instruments the client already has where possible; add only what makes accept/reject decisions obvious. Cadence and ownership are explicit so nothing depends on “someone remembering to follow up.”

Pre-PD

Baseline: three walkthrough look-fors (EL oral language, scaffolded output, formative use) scored once by site coaches; optional anonymized student language sample set agreed in writing.

During PD

Exit slip: 5-point competency self-rating on the two prioritized moves; implementation checklist started (yes/partial/no) before teachers leave the synchronous block.

Post-PD (30 days)

Short pulse survey: recommend score (0–10) + three self-ratings; repeat walkthrough on the same three look-fors; count of student tasks collected that match the new formative protocol.

Efficiency: Site coaches own walkthrough data entry weekly; program lead owns survey send + reminder (Day 7 + Day 21); Camino owns instrument text, cut scores interpretation against the locked success criteria, and a one-page readout within 5 business days of survey close.

Delivery contingencies — compact playbook

Practical if/then defaults keep the engagement moving without burning synchronous budget.

If primary platform fails mid-session
Switch to phone bridge for voice + screen-shared PDF pack within 10 minutes; async recording + slide deck posted within 24 hours.
If live attendance < 60% of invited pilot cohort
Record core model segment (≤25 min); assign async homework + optional 20-minute office-hours block; reschedule make-up only if listed in scope.
If substitute coverage cannot be secured
Reschedule synchronous block within 5 business days of written notice, or convert to shortened sync (45 min) + expanded async checklist — client picks one path at kickoff.
If tech equity gaps (bandwidth/devices)
PDF-first handouts, captioned recordings, Spanish companion summaries for family-facing lines; low-interactivity mode (chat-based checks instead of breakout rooms).
04Timeline
04

Four phases.
Nothing wasted.

Each phase sets up the next — no rework downstream.

Phase 1
Weeks 1–2
Discovery + Standards Alignment

Review your learner profile, existing materials, and program goals. Lock in the standards framework that drives everything downstream.

Phase 2
Weeks 3–6
Curriculum + Unit Development

Build the full scope and sequence, lesson plans, and instructional materials. The core delivery of the project.

Phase 3
Weeks 7–8
Assessment + Implementation Tools

Develop the diagnostic, formative, and summative toolkit. Finalize the teacher implementation guide.

Phase 4
Weeks 9–10
Training, Revisions + Final Handoff

Pre-PD discovery (stakeholder sync + artifact review) can run in parallel late in Phase 3. Run both virtual PD sessions, incorporate your team's feedback, and deliver the complete revised package.

Week 1 Discovery Build Tools Handoff · Week 10
05Audit pricing
05

Start where
you are.

Before committing to a full curriculum build, many teams start with an audit. Three options — each designed to give you exactly what you need to move forward with confidence.

Service: English Language Learner (ELL) Program Audit + 30-Day Action Plan (Bilingual)

Starter
$149
One-time · Flat fee
Document review of your existing ELL materials
45-minute strategy consultation
Top 5 priority recommendations delivered in writing
Get Started →
Implementation
$850
One-time · Flat fee
Full audit + complete 30-day action plan
2 live training sessions with your team
Editable team toolkit (templates, trackers, protocols)
Everything in Growth
Choose Implementation →

All packages include bilingual deliverables (EN/ES). No retainer required. Scope confirmed before work begins.

06Curriculum project investment
06

One fee.
No surprises.

Fixed-project pricing with milestone-based payment terms — so both sides stay aligned from start to finish.

Fixed Project Fee
$12,500
10-week engagement · All deliverables included
Payment Schedule
At Signing
$5,000
40%
At Midpoint
$3,750
30%
At Final Acceptance
$3,750
30%
Expected Outcomes
01
Cohesive, standards-aligned curriculum delivery across the program
02
Stronger teacher implementation consistency from day one
03
Clearer progress monitoring through aligned assessments at every stage
Julio César Manzano at a Fulbright-related convening
Public diplomacy context

Fulbright cohort work — language, mobility, and cross-border collaboration at the center.

Julio César Manzano at a district professional learning convening
District practice

Active district professional learning — the constraints on English Language Learner (ELL) teams are real, not theoretical.

Contact

Send inquiry

Main site contact form on caminoacademy.net — or use the email button below.

Sample materials only — final scope, fees, and dates belong in a signed agreement after a real discovery conversation.

What this sample shows
Contact form on caminoacademy.net, with email as an alternate path
Readable sections — deep detail tucked into accordions
Investment and tiers easy to scan
10-week timeline in four clear phases
PD arc: discovery-first, metrics, contingency defaults
Consistent Camino Academy visual system
Audit add-ons separated from the core build fee
Assumptions

Fixed-fee model and 10-week scope assumed based on standard program build engagements.

Audit packages (Starter / Growth / Implementation) are independent of the curriculum build and can be contracted separately.